![]() Logicians (INTP) (60%) agreed with our statement more than any other personality type and, along with Architects (INTJ) (55%) and Mediators (INFP) (51%), were one of only three personalities who agreed in the majority. It’s not hard to see why Analysts agreed the most, as many people do view their approach as unnecessarily complex, even if they acknowledge Analysts’ talent for discovery and innovation. But their tendency to get wrapped up in their own intellectual processes and imaginative explorations can sometimes cause them to get carried away and overcomplicate things.įurthermore, their independent streak can convince Analysts that their way is the best way, and as long as a solution works for them, they needn’t worry about making it easy for others who can’t keep up to understand. Problem-solving is one of Analysts’ favorite things to do, and as Thinking, Intuitive personalities, they are dedicated to finding solutions that are both logical and innovative. Which personality types are more likely to be perceived as the Rube Goldbergs among us? Let’s find out. 27%) and the Turbulent and Assertive traits (46% vs. To explore the role that personality type may play in this, we asked our readers whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement, “Other people often describe your ways of solving problems as unnecessarily complex.” Although a minority (38%) agreed overall, the results revealed significant disparities between every personality trait pairing, most notably between the Intuitive and Observant traits (46% vs. ![]() For those who look for the simplest, most elegant solutions to a problem, the strange contortions that some go through to find an answer can appear quite odd or frustrating. It can cost us valuable time, wear on our patience, and test our relationships. ![]() Many of us may marvel at the ingenuity of a Rube Goldberg machine yet at the same time wonder simply, “Why?”Īs creative and whimsical as Rube Goldberg machines can be, unnecessary complexity in real life is usually not so fun. Some people may be more impressed than others with such displays. (For an excellent example, check out OK Go’s music video for “This Too Shall Pass,” which for nearly four minutes shows the progress of an epic Rube Goldberg machine that “dances” along with the song and ultimately blasts the band members with paint.) One action sets off an intricate chain reaction where mechanisms like levers, inclined planes, and pulleys keep the machine in motion until it has carried out its designated task.Įven if you didn’t know what it was called, you’ve probably seen a Rube Goldberg machine in action before – such as the contraption that cooks (or attempts to cook) Doc Brown’s breakfast in the opening scene of the movie Back to the Future. They’re named after the American engineer-turned-cartoonist Rube Goldberg, who became famous in the early 20th century for his cartoons depicting wacky contraptions doing simple chores, like cleaning your chin with a self-operating napkin. Rube Goldberg machines are intentionally designed to accomplish very simple tasks in the most complicated way possible. The following sources refer to this exact type of material as 'technical', and they appear to be using the word 'technical' to describe what you are describing.If you’ve ever made a Rube Goldberg machine, perhaps for a school project or for fun, you’ll know just what it is: a deliberate, delightful glorification of unnecessary complexity. If you think that the topic material itself is the primary source for their use of jargon, then you can just call it 'technical'. Having or showing knowledge that is learned by studying I believe that 'erudite' is neutral-positive in connotation. If you feel like this choice of overly-complex words is more a product of their education and scholarly background and less a product of their ego, you may use 'erudite', although this doesn't necessarily imply that the lecture was difficult to follow. Each of those long words is referred to as a sesquipedalia. If someone gives a sesquipedalian speech, people often assume it was smart, even if they don’t really know what it was about because they can’t understand the words. Sesquipedalian can also be used to describe someone or something that overuses big words, like a philosophy professor or a chemistry textbook. ("Sesquipedalian" has a negative connotation.) If the topic is not natively impossible to understand, but the speaker is choosing overly-complex words, consider "sesquipedalian".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |